Jump to content
Toggle sidebar
ECT wiki
Search
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Talk
Contributions
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Editing
Expertise Reversal Principle
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=='''Evidence'''== As the level of learner knowledge in a domain change, the effectiveness of instructional formats need to change as well keeping into account the newly acquired expertise. Tobias <ref> Tobias, S. (1989). Another look at research on the adaptation of instruction to student characteristics. Educational Psychologist, 24, 213β227</ref> demonstrated that higher levels of domain knowledge requires lower level of structure and support in instruction. This is since their prior knowledge already form [[chunking | chunks]] of information in their long-term memory. Multi-media instruction is more effective for low knowledge learners than high-knowledge learners <ref> Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press </ref>. The expertise reversal principle operates within the framework of [[Cognitive Load Theory]] and essential information for low knowledge learners becomes extraneous information becomes extraneous information for high-knowledge learners. In Mayer and Gallini's study <ref> Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715β726 </ref> high-knowledge had very little effect due to the text-only instruction and text-and-illustrations instruction on their retention and [[transfer]] tests compared to low-level learners. Furthermore, [[Split Attention Principle | split attention effect]] did not affect their learning <ref> Mayer, R. E., Steinhoff, K., Bower, G., & Mars, R. (1995). A generative theory of textbook design: Using annotated illustrations to foster meaningful learning of science text. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43, 31β43. </ref> Furthermore, multi-media computer simulated diagrams had a reduced benefit on high-knowledge learners than low-level learners <ref> Ollerenshaw, A., Aidman, E., & Kidd, G. (1997). Is an illustration always worth ten thousand words? Effects of prior knowledge, learning style, and multimedia illustrations on text comprehension. International Journal of Instructional Media, 24, 227β238 </ref> Kalyuga, Chandler, and Sweller conducted a series of studies to look at how different instructional formats and levels of learner expertise interact as learners become more experienced in a specific task. By studying novice to expert learners, they concluded instructional techniques that were effective with low-knowledge learners became ineffective and even had negative effects when the learners became more knowledgeable in the domain.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ECT wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ECT wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)