Jump to content
Toggle sidebar
ECT wiki
Search
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Talk
Contributions
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Editing
Dual coding theory
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== '''Challenges''' == Screen-based learning with engaging graphics and sounds may help learners focus and learn, but there are still some significant problems to consider. However, working memory processing is restricted, and the integration of auditory and visual information will be limited by the cognitive load(Sweller et al., 1998). If dual-channel instructional media content contains a significant number of stunning images as well as audio and video files, whether the auditory or visual channel provide too much information to be processed, resulting in cognitive overload and limiting learners' learning? Therefore, how can instructional designers make better use of DCT without putting themselves in danger of having to deal with extraneous cognitive load? I believe that we should consider the above questions before adopting dual-channel instructional media materials.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ECT wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ECT wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)