Jump to content
Toggle sidebar
ECT wiki
Search
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Talk
Contributions
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Editing
Reinforcement
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
= '''Overview''' = Reinforcement "'''is any consequence of behavior that increases the likelihood that the behavior will be repeated in the future"'''<ref name=":0">Martinez, M. E. (2010). Behaviorism. In ''Learning and cognition: The design of the mind''. essay, Merrill.</ref>. Reinforcement is under the behaviorism theory. Under that theory, all human actions are learnt by interacting with the environment. There are two types of reinforcement in behaviorism. Positive reinforcement is “a stimulus that, when presented after a response, strengthens the response"<ref name=":0" />. The negative reinforcement is “Any stimulus that, when removed after a response, strengthens the response”<ref name=":0" />. In education, reinforcement is often used because it is simple and effective. It is especially powerful for young children or the beginning of developing a habit. = '''Evidence''' = The operant conditioning chamber (also called skinner box) shows good evidence about reinforcement strength behavior<ref>Skinner BF (1983). ''A Matter of Consequences''. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. pp. 116, 164.</ref>. The skinner box is built on Edward Thorndike’s puzzle box experiment<ref>Thorndike, E. L. (1927). The law of effect. ''The American journal of psychology'', ''39''(1/4), 212-222.</ref>. In Skinner's experiment, he put a mouse (Thorndike used a hungry cat) in a box with a variety of stimulants. During the mouse exploration, it will find a level which will give food if it pushes it. Although he will not immediately repeat this behavior, but long-term reward given, the mouse will become habitually pushed to the level. This experiment illustrates that positive reinforcement can enhance a behavior's repetition. Skinner also tested negative reinforcement. The rat will be kept in electric shock until it pushes the lever. Although the rat did not receive any reward for this behavior, the rat still acquired the habit in the long run. = '''Design Implications''' = In Martinez's book ''Learning and cognition: The design of the mind''<ref name=":0" />, he uses the example of a father trying to help his daughter develop the habit of folding her quilt. In order to encourage her to fold the quilt, the father would reward her after doing that. However, in order to avoid the daughter becoming dependent on the reward and thus not continuing the behavior if the reward is stopped, it is better for the father to reward her at random times. Similarly, if we want to use positive reinforcement to encourage students to study, we can give more verbal encouragement when they do well on a test, or give a reward for good performance on a random test. The classic example of negative reinforcement is the seat belt alarm. Basically, all cars now have a setting that will always trigger an alarm if you don't wear your seat belt. If the car owner does not want to hear the annoying noise, he or she must wear the seat belt. Over time, the habit of wearing a seat belt will develop. Since the alarm is always there, we don't have to worry that removing it will cause the behavior to go extinct. = '''Challenges''' = The main problem about reinforcement(also the main problem about behaviorism since reinforcement is the key idea of behaviorism) is its definition. The definition itself is “impossible to test the idea that reinforcement causes behavior to be repeated”<ref name=":0" />, because it is a circular definition. “Reinforcement is any consequence of behavior that increases the likelihood that the behavior will be repeated in the future”<ref name=":0" />, is trying to define the results of behavior by behavior. In this case, Martinez declared that “ it is not a conclusion; rather, it is an assumption— an assumption, by the way, that can accommodate any evidence because it is not data-dependent”<ref name=":0" />. Of course, we can see that all of the above sections prove that behaviorism or reinforcement is work, but whether a circular definition as a definition can be accepted depends on each person's different ideas. Academically, it is very difficult to admit. From my personal point of view, because there are a lot of reinforcement examples in real life, even though I also question the definition, that doesn't stop it from existing and its value in education. = '''Reference''' =
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ECT wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ECT wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)